The
paintings are made of flicks of paint, brush marks. The impression is
that the painters were trained to make brush sketches. There's a lot
of movement in the figures and the way they are painted: it's a
lively way of painting. Great images of figures and animals in
movement. There's little attempt to smooth out the marks to make a
photorealistic image: a highlight is built up out of a big
medium-tone mark with a smaller lighter mark within it. Some work is
sketchy, a few quick flicks to create a face, some is more carefully
built up, but the marks are still fluent, lively. It's fresco, so
painting had to be quick before the plaster dried.
There
were great Roman painters of the human figure, of still life, of
landscape, of plants and flowers, birds and animals. Birds and
animals must be the commonest decorative motifs; huntings scenes,
dogs and deer, less common. The Romans must have loved to feel they
lived in an ordered landscape, the natural landscape, with trees,
temples, hills, human/divine figures (they look much the same).
The
paintings in the Museo Nazionale in Naples give the impression of
being individual paintings, but of course they are the bits the
archaeologists picked out. At their best they are remarkable. Scenes
from myth are imagined and painted with remarkable skill.
You
could sneak this into an exhibition of Renaissance painting, and it
wouldn't be out of place. The story of the minotaur (lower left) slain by Theseus. It's incredible how similar in style these
paintings are to renaissance art. I don't think renaissance
painters had access to any Roman painting: sculptures were being
discovered, but I'm not aware that paintings were known. And it's
extraordinary that often enough these scenes appear, in a painted
frame, in the middle of a solid red wall. Before picture frames
were invented! Our galleries of classical painting still follow this
example. But occasionally in Pompeii, a single figure appears in the centre of a
wall, without a frame. It can be breathtaking.
Roman
painting fed off Greek painting. Apart from the wonderful vases, I'm
not sure that much Greek painting has survived, but there's a huge
mosaic in Naples (composed, incidentally, of the tiniest tesserae)
which is thought to be a Roman copy of a lost Greek painting. (A smaller
copy is in Pompeii.)
It recalls Ucello's Battle of San Romano, which
is perhaps a millenium and a half later and much more formulaic. Here, the
horses are in movement and at all angles, and the figures are
interlaced in a complex image of war, often linked by where fighters
are looking. It's quite extraordinary. It's a reminder that our view
of art is conditioned by what has survived, not by what existed. I've
read that the use of blue to suggest distance, along with smaller
figures, was a Chinese innovation from the T'ang dynasty, around
900CE. Not so. It was there in Pompeii 1,000 years earlier.
The
human figure, often partly or completely unclothed, is very much the
central motif: human or divine, there's not much different. They are
painted with wonderful warmth, and they almost step out of the
paintings. & the Museo Nazionale is a wonderful space for the
work, the more wonderful that it has windows that open and you can
step out onto big balconies and refresh your gaze by looking out over
the city. It makes the paintings less of museum pieces and more part
of contemporary life, where the background sound isn't the hushed tones of a
museum but the sound of the streets below.
& in Naples
there are just two paintings of painters at work: in both,
the painters are women.